<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Decaflon Thread: Oldskool BBS and UseNet question</title>
<link>http://decaflon.com/notes/</link>
<description>Decaflon Thread: Oldskool BBS and UseNet question</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:19:54 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Oldskool BBS and UseNet question</title>
<link>http://decaflon.com/technology/notes/9654/p/1/#response-115100</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:03:52</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Cappuccino</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">115100</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;OMG, my love affair with online communications began with BBS'ing.  Forums were by large threaded as mentioned before.  The really cool thing though, was FidoNet.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidonet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidonet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was the thing that took your BBS from a singular presence and connected it with the the world.  In my opinion, the precursor to usenet groups.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really consider that the golden age, it was wild that is for sure.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oldskool BBS and UseNet question</title>
<link>http://decaflon.com/technology/notes/9654/p/1/#response-99891</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:43:58</pubDate>
<dc:creator>silvertje</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">99891</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for all the first-hand info Ozone42! I was born a tad late for BBS but I still remember the shrieking sound of our 28k modem and the joy of IRC. Oh the gold old (slow) times.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oldskool BBS and UseNet question</title>
<link>http://decaflon.com/technology/notes/9654/p/1/#response-99667</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:58:04</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ozone42</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">99667</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh nostalgia.  I used to be a SysOp and a CoSysOp.  BBS was pretty varied.  There were a lot of systems in use, and everyone was trying new things.  Really it was a very exciting time.  I was in the thick of it using 1200, 2400, whoo-whee fast 4800 baud modems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had a 300, but really there wasn't much to use them on at that point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of the systems had a forum structure similar to a lot of the web forums nowadays.  You had a list of forums, you could create a topic, you could respond to that topic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some had chat rooms which were cool, predecessors to IRC, the beginnings of emoticons.  A lot had file libraries, which you could browse directories pick files and download them.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You should look into some more specifics with the types of BBS software.  The most popular in my area were:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.renegadebbs.net/news.php'&gt;Renegade BBS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_BBS'&gt;MBBS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcat%21_BBS'&gt;Wildcat!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pcboard'&gt;PC Board&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These systems gave rise to shareware, ansi art (which was fantastic,) and a lot of the early hackers and &quot;scene&quot; programmers.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oldskool BBS and UseNet question</title>
<link>http://decaflon.com/technology/notes/9654/p/1/#response-99661</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:39:31</pubDate>
<dc:creator>silvertje</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">99661</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering where to put this note, I really wanted to post it in the non-existing category Web-- but decided to post it here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am doing some pre-web research and I have a question about BBS and UseNet. It is difficult to find the answer on the web as it concerns pre-web topcis (even though Google owns the UseNet archive)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did BBS and UseNet discussion forums/boards have the same structure?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found somewhere that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The most commonly used BBS structure is a two dimensional topic tree. Each leave contains a list of senders and subject titles in a reverse chronological order. The contributions are kept for a certain period of time and may be sometimes retrieved in an archive. Browsing of subject keywords may be available. (Alton-Scheidl, 1993)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And UseNet articles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;are organized into topical categories called newsgroups, which are themselves logically organized into hierarchies of subjects. For instance, sci.math and sci.physics are within the sci hierarchy, for science. When a user subscribes to a newsgroup, the news client software keeps track of which articles that user has read. (Wikipedia)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can actually remember using UseNet but I have no way of knowing whether BBS discussions followed the same format. Any ideas?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

