So, I've been listening to a lot of new music lately, as I often do. Among some of my more recent additions are a couple of lovely Brits who sing what I'd call throwback pop/R&B/jazz; very reminiscent of the Motown sound of the 60s, but updated so it's more relevant. The artists I'm referencing specifically are Adele (1, 2, 3 and, more so, Dufy (1, 2, 3. I'd also put Amy Winehouse in the same category, though I am much more partial to her music.
As I was surfing around Youtube trying to find other songs by both artists (as they've yet to release albums stateside), I ran across several comments about how original these artists are and, the part that cheesed me off, how far superior they are to current American musicians.
So, being me, I responded to a couple of the comments just pointing out the fact that "original arists" are borrowing heavily from early American R&B. Some only emulate the feel or vibe, while others sample directly from the music of that era. Are they creating something fresh and enjoyable? Absolutely. But, at the same time, they're essentially just building on the work of previous artists.
Apparently, that was a mistake. :) I have been given the "thumbs down" dozens of times, been sent hate mail, had people report me for Youtube, etc. Simply for pointing out the fact that, while this artists are great, they are borrowing much of their sound from previous decades. And, while some of my favorite artists are not American, you've gotta respect the contribution that the original American artists made in shaping R&B jazz. To prove my point, where would either genre be without the existence, or mainstream popularity of, Big Mama Thornton, Ella Fitzgerald, Louis Armstrong, The Supremes, Barry Gordy, The Tempations, and dozens of others.
As a traditional artist myself (I've been drawing painting since before I could talk), I could spend my time recreating the works of other artists. I could do my own version of the Mona Lisa for instance. If I did, and it gained any amount of public attention, it would always be linked and compared to the original. Is it so different for musicians?
What it boils down to for me is respecting the past. The artists I'm referencing are great but, to me, they're adding to the existing legacy of other artists who pioneered the R&B and jazz sounds.
I guess my point is this: when does imitation become unique art?
» An iPhone with a keyboard? ... Last Reply: 4 months ago by ryanarrowsmith.
I'm with RightOn...can't see a physical keyboard, especially after Jobs mocked it at WDCC. They can make one unit that is capable of changing languages at any time, within moments. Plus more moving parts = more opportunities for shit to break, something Apple wants to prevent.
In the wake of the iPhone, the market is moving towards touchscreen technology. Look at how many have been released in the last year. Why would Apple go backwards?